In a stunning development that has sent shockwaves through the conservative world, longtime Republican Oklahoma legislator Mickey Edwards, a founding trustee of the Heritage Foundation, has thrown his support behind Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris. This unexpected endorsement has left many within the Republican Party and conservative circles questioning how one of their own could cross party lines in such a high-profile manner.
Mickey Edwards, whose full name is Marvin H. Edwards, is no ordinary Republican. He served as a U.S. congressman from Oklahoma’s 5th congressional district from 1977 to 1993, where he became known as a staunch conservative and a leading voice within the GOP. He also played a pivotal role in shaping conservative ideology as a founding trustee of the Heritage Foundation and as the national chairman of the American Conservative Union (ACU) and the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC). His conservative credentials are impeccable, making this endorsement even more perplexing to many of his former colleagues.
For decades, Edwards stood as a bulwark of conservative principles, helping to define and promote the values that have shaped the Republican Party for generations. His legacy within the conservative movement includes his contributions to landmark organizations like the Heritage Foundation, which remains one of the most influential think tanks in conservative politics today. To say that Edwards’ endorsement of Kamala Harris is a bombshell would be an understatement. It’s nothing short of a seismic shift in the political landscape.
The endorsement gained additional traction online after it was shared on X (formerly known as Twitter) by Oklahoma City Mayor David Holt. While Holt has not officially endorsed a presidential candidate, he has not been shy about publicly criticizing the Republican nominee, Donald Trump. Holt’s amplification of Edwards’ endorsement adds another layer of complexity to an already unusual situation.
In a piece published by The Philadelphia Inquirer, Edwards made his case for supporting Harris, primarily focusing on the importance of foreign policy in this election. He expressed grave concerns over Donald Trump’s handling of international relations and warned that Trump’s potential return to the White House would be disastrous for U.S. alliances abroad.
Edwards wrote that U.S. allies simply cannot trust Donald Trump. In his view, Trump’s erratic behavior and disregard for diplomatic norms have left America’s closest partners in a precarious position. Edwards argued that countries like China, Russia, and North Korea are authoritarian regimes that could easily manipulate Trump through flattery, threatening both American security and global stability. His concerns about Trump’s coziness with dictators and authoritarian leaders reflect a fear that another Trump presidency could lead the U.S. down a dangerous path of isolationism and weakened alliances.
By contrast, Edwards praised Kamala Harris for her ability to work across the aisle, citing her experience in the Senate as evidence that she is capable of forging bipartisan solutions. He suggested that Harris is the kind of leader that Western democracies will respect and trust, particularly at a time when America’s alliances are under unprecedented strain. Edwards wrote that the U.S. needs a “serious person” to lead the country, someone who understands the complex challenges posed by tyrants abroad and who can effectively safeguard American interests.
This is where Edwards’ argument hits at the heart of his disillusionment with Trump. While the former president’s isolationist policies and volatile relationships with world leaders may have played well with his base, Edwards sees them as existential threats to the U.S. and its allies. For a man who spent his career advocating for a strong, principled foreign policy, Trump’s behavior is not just embarrassing—it’s dangerous.
Listen to “Women Who Willingly Engage in Sexual Depravity” on Spreaker.
Edwards’ critique of Trump isn’t solely focused on foreign policy, however. It’s clear that he views the current state of the Republican Party with a degree of despair, recognizing that Trump’s influence has pushed the GOP further into a corner of extremism and populism that is difficult to reconcile with traditional conservative values. In backing Harris, Edwards appears to be making a broader statement about the future of American democracy. He’s warning that the GOP, under Trump’s leadership, has veered off course in a way that could have long-lasting consequences for both the country and the world.
To those within the Republican Party, especially the die-hard Trump supporters, Edwards’ endorsement will likely be seen as nothing short of betrayal. It’s not just that he endorsed a Democrat—it’s that he endorsed Kamala Harris, someone who has been at the center of Republican attacks for years. But Edwards’ decision speaks to a larger issue within the GOP: the growing divide between traditional conservatives and Trump’s brand of populist politics. This endorsement may be a signal that some conservatives are willing to prioritize the country’s stability and international standing over party loyalty.
Edwards’ endorsement of Harris also raises questions about the state of conservatism in the post-Trump era. While many Republicans remain firmly in Trump’s camp, others are increasingly disillusioned by his divisive rhetoric, disdain for democratic norms, and cozy relationships with authoritarian leaders. For someone like Edwards, who built his career on promoting conservative principles, Trump’s leadership may have crossed a line that can no longer be ignored.
At the end of the day, Mickey Edwards’ endorsement of Kamala Harris is a bold and controversial move. It’s a decision that will undoubtedly provoke fierce backlash from the GOP, but it also reflects a deeper concern about the direction of the country under Trump’s leadership. For Edwards, this is about more than just party politics—it’s about the future of American democracy and the role the U.S. will play in an increasingly volatile world.
As the 2024 election draws nearer, Edwards’ endorsement is a stark reminder that the Republican Party is far from unified behind its nominee. Whether his decision will influence other conservatives to rethink their support for Trump remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: this endorsement has shaken the political world to its core.
I want to know what you think!
Send me your views, thoughts or what’s on your mind and we will feature on our newsletter or show!
Email to [email protected] OR
Leave a text, voice note or voicemail for the show on what your thoughts are at 708-982-0974
Connect with me on Spreely Social CLICK HERE to Check out Spreely Social
And don’t forget to watch us LIVE weekdays at 1p est! CLICK HERE to Watch The Rants of Izzo Show!
-Izzo
