The recent reports of medically proven and verified vaccine injuries and deaths from the COVID-19 vaccines have sparked significant outrage among many, especially given the initial narrative promoted by the media and government agencies.

This fury is further inflamed by the perceived suppression and downplaying of effective treatments like Ivermectin. As someone who values both medicine and individual choice, it is crucial to address these concerns head-on, highlighting the divide these policies have created in our society, and advocating against coercive government mandates.

The COVID-19 vaccines, developed and distributed at an unprecedented speed, have undeniably saved countless lives. However, their rapid deployment and the ensuing government mandates have not come without significant consequences.

Recent studies have confirmed rare but serious side effects associated with the vaccines. For instance, the Global Vaccine Data Network study identified increased risks of myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA vaccines (Pfizer and Moderna), and Guillain-Barré syndrome and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) following viral vector vaccines like AstraZeneca​ (FactCheck.org)​​ (BMJ)​. These conditions, while rare, have led to severe health implications for those affected.

Furthermore, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have acknowledged these adverse events, confirming cases of myocarditis and pericarditis, particularly in young males following the second dose of mRNA vaccines. Approximately 80% of these patients recovered within 90 days, but the impact on those affected and their families cannot be understated​ (CDC)​. Similarly, the Johnson & Johnson vaccine has been linked to thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS), prompting health authorities to prefer mRNA vaccines over it​ (FactCheck.org)​.

Listen to “Become WAR. EP – 15 Noah Valinsky: Husband, Father, Warrior, Knight” on Spreaker.

Key Findings from Recent Studies

1. Myocarditis and Pericarditis: Studies have confirmed that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, such as those developed by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, are linked to rare cases of myocarditis and pericarditis, particularly in younger males aged 18-39. Myocarditis, an inflammation of the heart muscle, and pericarditis, an inflammation of the outer lining of the heart, have been observed more frequently after the second dose of these vaccines. The risk is higher with the Moderna vaccine compared to Pfizer-BioNTech​ (FactCheck.org)​​ (BMJ)​.
2. Neurological Conditions: The AstraZeneca vaccine has been associated with rare neurological conditions, such as Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST). Guillain-Barré syndrome is a rare disorder where the body’s immune system attacks the nerves, and CVST involves blood clots in the brain’s venous sinuses. The Global Vaccine Data Network study observed a statistically significant increase in these conditions following vaccination with AstraZeneca​ (BMJ)​.
3. Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome (TTS): The Johnson & Johnson (J&J) vaccine has been linked to thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS), a rare but serious condition involving blood clots and low platelet counts. This has led to a preference for mRNA vaccines over the J&J vaccine in the United States​ (CDC)​.
4. Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis (ADEM) and Transverse Myelitis: Another recent finding is the potential association of the Moderna and AstraZeneca vaccines with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), an autoimmune condition causing inflammation of the brain and spinal cord, and transverse myelitis, which involves inflammation of both sides of one section of the spinal cord. These conditions are extremely rare, with risks translating to fewer than 1 case per million doses​ (FactCheck.org)​​ (BMJ)​.

The mainstream media and government have often highlighted the rarity of these adverse events, arguing that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks. However, the experiences of those who have suffered from these side effects tell a different story.

The intense scrutiny and reporting requirements have led to a significant increase in the number of adverse events reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), with many experts arguing that this surge reflects not only true medical concerns but also heightened public awareness and reporting due to the vaccine’s prominence in daily news​ (FactCheck.org)​.

What exacerbates the situation is the heavy-handed approach taken by governments worldwide, which has often sidelined alternative treatments like Ivermectin.

Multiple studies have suggested that Ivermectin could play a role in reducing COVID-19 severity, yet these findings have been largely dismissed or downplayed by health authorities and mainstream media. This has fueled a growing mistrust among the public, who feel their right to choose their medical treatments is being undermined.

Listen to “Assassination Attempt on Trump, RFK Jr is THE Establishment, Bullying Your Kids to Save Them” on Spreaker.

The coercive nature of vaccine mandates has also led to significant societal divisions. Families, friends, and communities have been torn apart over differing views on vaccination. The rhetoric that those who question vaccine safety are “anti-science” or “anti-vax” has only deepened these rifts.

It’s important to recognize that advocating for medical freedom and questioning government mandates does not equate to being anti-vaccine. Many who raise concerns about vaccine injuries are pro-medicine and pro-choice, believing in the right to make informed decisions about their health without coercion.

In light of these medically verified vaccine injuries and deaths, it is imperative to call for more transparent reporting and open dialogue about the risks and benefits of COVID-19 vaccines.

Governments and health agencies must prioritize the concerns of those affected and ensure that vaccine safety monitoring systems are robust and transparent. Additionally, alternative treatments should be given fair consideration and integrated into the broader strategy to combat COVID-19.

A hit was put out on Trump?

Ultimately, it is the right of every individual to make informed decisions about their health. The government’s role should be to provide clear, unbiased information and support rather than impose mandates that infringe on personal freedoms. The COVID-19 pandemic has shown us the critical importance of trust in public health measures. To rebuild this trust, transparency, respect for individual choice, and acknowledgment of vaccine injuries are essential steps forward.

As we move past the immediate crisis, let us strive for a balanced approach that respects medical science while honoring the autonomy and rights of individuals. Only through such a balanced approach can we heal the divisions and move towards a more united and healthy future.