In the world of political predictions, some hits and misses are more spectacular than others—and J. Ann Selzer just delivered a whopper. The veteran pollster has announced her retirement after confidently predicting that Kamala Harris would win Iowa. Yes, folks, you heard it right. Selzer, who’s spent decades as a fixture in the polling world, apparently went all-in on a prediction that Harris would triumph in a state that had other plans entirely. The laughter and disbelief practically write themselves.
Selzer, whose work has been touted as the “gold standard” by left-leaning outlets, now has one of the most memorable blunders in modern political polling to her name. It’s a reminder that the mainstream media’s “experts” can get it just as wrong as anyone—sometimes more so. Predicting that Kamala Harris, whose campaign was consistently stumbling and failing to connect with voters, would win Iowa is like betting on a snowstorm in the desert. Sure, it could happen, but most people know better.
Iowa voters clearly had other thoughts. Instead of embracing Harris’s campaign of platitudes and political pandering, they sent a clear message: hard pass. But Selzer’s confidence in a Harris victory has now become the stuff of political legend—and not the good kind. For many conservatives, this kind of out-of-touch prediction from supposedly “trusted” pollsters is par for the course. They never seem to learn, do they?
The retirement announcement has been met with predictable laughter and mockery from the right. Social media lit up with reactions like, “Another ‘expert’ bites the dust. Good riddance!” and “Selzer’s Iowa prediction aged like milk.” Ouch. But can you blame them? After all, this wasn’t just a minor misstep—it was a prediction that perfectly encapsulated just how detached many in the polling industry have become from reality.
The mainstream media has long relied on pollsters like Selzer to spin narratives that favor their preferred candidates. This time, they fell flat on their faces. While conservative pollsters have been urging more transparency and accuracy, liberal-leaning outlets were content to run with whatever rosy forecasts they could find. Selzer’s spectacularly wrong prediction is the latest example of just how flawed that approach really is.
Of course, Kamala Harris’s crushing defeat didn’t just sink Selzer’s prediction; it sent shockwaves through the Democratic Party. The vice president’s campaign was supposed to be a unifying force, but instead, it became a symbol of disconnected leadership and failed promises. Harris’s inability to connect with everyday Americans only made Selzer’s misguided prediction even more laughable. It wasn’t just wrong—it was embarrassingly so.
As Selzer heads off into retirement, one has to wonder if she’ll spend some time reflecting on the reality gap between elite pollsters and the everyday Americans they claim to understand. Conservatives have long warned against the perils of ignoring middle America and embracing echo chambers. Selzer’s Iowa prediction might just be the poster child for that kind of hubris.
In the end, the joke is clear: while the experts play guessing games, the American people make the real decisions. And as for J. Ann Selzer’s prediction about Iowa? Well, it’s safe to say it aged about as well as Kamala Harris’s campaign did. Good luck in retirement, Selzer—you’ve given us all a good laugh!
I want to know what you think!
Send me your views, thoughts or what’s on your mind and we will feature on our newsletter or show!
Email to [email protected] OR
Leave a text, voice note or voicemail for the show on what your thoughts are at 708-982-0974
Connect with me on Spreely Social CLICK HERE to Check out Spreely Social
Join the Rants of Izzo Show chat! https://t.me/+hykjn-AtipliZGVh
And don’t forget to watch us LIVE weekdays at 1p est! CLICK HERE to Watch The Rants of Izzo Show!
-Izzo
